Friday, April 3, 2015

The Buddhist and South Vietnam Government Conflict 

The 1960's was a trying time in South Vietnam with not only the Vietnam War escalating but the conflict between the government of South Vietnam and the practicing Buddhists of the country as well. Both sides battled over religious freedoms and the Buddhists wanted to be able to practice their religion without being persecuted. Each side didn't want to budge and both sides would show that they were willing to stop at nothing to get their views expressed to the masses. Many bloody and sad events took place over a span of several months and in the end many things would change but there would still be many things left unanswered.


            During the 1960’s the war in Vietnam was starting to escalate from not only outside causes but from internal issues as well. One internal factor was fought between the South Vietnam government lead by Ngô Đình Diệm who was a practicing Roman Catholic and the high population of Buddhists living in South Vietnam (Moyer 2004 ). The high number of practicing Buddhists in the country didn’t agree with the political and religious actions being done by Ngo Dinh Diem and the South Vietnamese government. This in turn led to conflicts between the government and the Buddhists and at the end of this conflict many things were different in South Vietnam including a coup that overthrew the Ngo Dinh Diem government as well as other things (Browne 2003). There were many things that led to the coup that were parts of the overall conflict but there were three things in my opinion that are the things that led to the coup and the escalation of the Vietnam war. The first incident was when a group of Buddhists were protesting their right to fly the Buddhist flag for a religious event and when things started to get out of hand the government fired their weapons into the crowd killing 9 and wounding many others (Goodman 1970). The second incident was when Thích Quảng Đức burned himself to death in the middle of a busy intersection in South Vietnam (Goodman 1970). The third and final incident happened after months of things happening in South Vietnam involving Buddhists and the government which caused the Kennedy administration to take notice and have a subtle hand in the overthrowing of the Ngo Dinh Diem regime (Library 2015).
Image result for buddhist
            The first incident that took place happened on May 8th in Hue South Vietnam this was not only a major event this was the first event in the conflict as well. There was already tension among Buddhists and the Roman Catholic practicing government over how the Buddhists were allowed to practice their religion. The government had issued a law stating that you couldn’t fly a religious flag and this upset the Buddhists because they weren’t allowed to fly the flag on Vesak which is the birthday of Gautama Buddha (Ferraro 1963). This incident was escalated because not even a week earlier the government flew the Vatican flag at a ceremony for a religious official and there was no problem with them doing that yet the Buddhist weren’t allowed to fly their flag of their religion on a religious holiday. For this many Buddhists protesters took to the street and starting marching in protest against the government and the wrong that they were doing to the people of the Buddhist faith. As the protesters started making their way to busier roads and closer to areas where they could be seen and even joined by other Buddhists the police and army broke it up by firing into the crowd, this resulted in 9 protesters being killed and many others being wounded (Roberts 1966). This was the start of the end for the Ngo Dinh Diem government and not probably seen at the time but also a possible reason for the escalation of the Vietnam War (Patricia Rushton 2005)Image result for buddhist crisis
            The second incident that took place happened shortly after the protests in Hue, this event happened on June 11th when Thích Quảng Đức burned himself to death in front of a large crowd in the middle of a busy intersection in South Vietnam (King 2000). The monk was doing this to protest the unjust on uncivil acts being done to the people of the Buddhist religion by the people in the South Vietnam government. Buddhists had been traveling around for days and days protesting in many different places in South Vietnam and they were doing so in many different fashions but no one expected what was to come with the event that happened with the Monk. This event was such a major one because it was captured by a western news agency which in turn showed the whole world the tragedies that were happening in South Vietnam and the Buddhists fight against the government and the costs they were willing to take to get their message out that they wanted their religious and political freedoms just like everyone else (Smith 1970). The pictures captured of the burning monk were the first photos witnessed by the western world of the things going on in South Vietnam and to a great degree it bothered many people and they were asking for something to be done to change this from happening over there. 
            Image result for buddhist crisis
       The third and final event that caused the coup of the Ngo Dinh Diem government and the escalation of the Vietnam War was when the Kennedy administration and the United States government saw the overwhelming dislike of Ngo Dinh Diem and the government by a large portion of the South Vietnam population and realized they needed to take some kind of action in finding a solution and try and help the problems (Library 2015). President Kennedy and the United States government launched a fact finding mission in South Vietnam to see how the war was going as well as trying to find out if the problems with the Buddhists and the South Vietnam government could spill over and cause more problems for the United States and its allies in the Vietnam War. The two officials sent to handle the mission came back to the president with two very different results, one of them told the president that everything was going fine and that the government could handle both the war and the Buddhist conflict, while the other official told the president that the problems in South Vietnam were far greater than the United States government had first predicted (Topmiller 2002). This advisor told the president that the government was unfavorable in South Vietnam and that there could very well be a religious civil war from the government and the Buddhists clashing. After nearly 6 months of conflict Ngo Dinh Diem and his government were overthrown in a coup orchestrated by the Army of The Republic of Vietnam and backed by many United States officials. Ngo Dinh Diem was assassinated during this process and a new leader was put in place.
Image result for buddhist crisis
            After doing some research on this topic I was able to see how both sides wanted to fight for their equal rights but the government just had far more resources to do it in the beginning and the only way the Buddhists could fight back was with their bodies and their will. In South Vietnam many of the people living there are in the Buddhists religion but the government there was ran by a Roman Catholic leader and so that is what the top religion of South Vietnam was going to be. In my opinion I believe if the Vietnam War wasn’t going on than the South Vietnam government might have been able to keep its role of power in the country but with the war going on the United States and its allies needed to make sure the country was secure from the inside out and make sure that everything was running smoothly. At the start of the conflict the South Vietnam government and the Buddhists both wanted their religious views to be heard but in the end it was a completely different thing. The government was overthrown and the leader was assassinated and on the other hand the Buddhist is the country really didn’t get a win out of the deal because they still had to fight for their religious views and ways for years to come. I think from this conflict the United States got a higher level of involvement in Vietnam and they wanted to have their hand in not only helping the country but they wanted to be able to secure itself in the region for future political gains (Library 2015).

            To conclude the South Vietnam and Buddhist conflict was many things to many people. On one side the Buddhist wanted their freedom, that is why they marched in protest in Hue and were willing to sacrifice lives for their cause and on the other side of that the government felt what they were doing was right and that breaking up the demonstrations would be the right course of action to take. When the Buddhist lit himself on fire and burned to death to show the government that the Buddhist were willing to do the ultimate sacrifice in the name of their religion and the name of their rights as human beings. The government wanted to shut these things down but when the pictures of this incident reached the world everyone started to take notice of this country and the things that were happening in it and without the help of the journalists covering those stories many people would have probably never known what was going on there. Finally when the United States government found out and wanted to get involved and help the problems in South Vietnam it was the end for Ngo Dinh Diem and his governments regime in that region. There was no clear victor from this conflict but it did change how people viewed and saw the people of Vietnam and it possibly changed the whole outcome of the Vietnam War from many standpoints. Without this conflict and the way it ended the history books may be very different in what they tell about this region of the world and the way the Vietnam War was fought and won, the Buddhists in the world may be viewed differently as well as their in Vietnam. This conflict was fought with great pride on both sides and in the end it was both sides still wanting to fight for their way of life and their way of freedom and religion. 

5 comments:

  1. This is quite an interesting topic about which I was not aware. What stood out to me was how the leader of South Vietnam was Catholic, while the majority of the population identified as Buddhist. While this normally would not be that large of an issue, when the leader began preventing the Buddhists from taking certain actions while allowing the Catholics to have those privileges, it created larger problems in the country. One could easily compare that to the fear in the United States of electing Kennedy because he was a Catholic. What can be seen here is the difference between the two leaders. Based on President Kennedy’s response, there is evidence which shows he was able to successfully prevent his religion from playing a role in the decision making process. While one could easily imagine his gut reaction would be to support a fellow Catholic leader, yet his decision was to show support for the Buddhists. In this way, I was surprised that religion had played such a role in the case of South Vietnam. Overall, having a leader who identifies as having a religion that is a minority is a common reason throughout history for unrest between the government and its citizens.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your topic was very interesting to me because I had no idea that this kind of conflict had happened between the Buddhists and Catholics in Vietnam. Maybe calling it a conflict is a bit of a stretch, but the issues that were going on there were definitely wrong. Do you think when the monk set himself on fire it was not only a testament to how strongly he felt about his religion but also to try and get international attention to their cause? We have discussed in class before the power the media has with religious topics, especially when one religion is having their rights infringed upon. We also see a similar problem in the some Middle Eastern countries where there is a religious leader the represents the minority of a religion in the country and it is causing lots of problems in the region, so I think this topic a good connection to that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That is an interesting aspect of the turbulent times Vietnam faced in the 20th Century. In your research did you come across any information about how both Catholicism and Buddhism fared after the end of the Vietnam War? Most communist regimes are not friendly to religions, or in some cases outright hostile to them. It would be interesting to see how similar the fate of these two groups was after being in contention for so long before hand. While they may have had their problems with each other at the time, I wonder how the relationship between the two faiths might have evolved after living under the communist rule of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Its also interesting to note that under French rule the Catholic Church was a favored religion as well. It seems like this carried on to the next government of South Vietnam after the removal of the French.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is probably one of the most controversial topics in American politics. Experts, are still divided about whether or not America should have intervened in Vietnam. I personally don’t think that the US, intervened in Vietnam to stop the religious oppression that was going on. On the contrary, I think the US intervened because Kennedy, wanted to stop the Communist movement, which was gaining prominence at the time. The Communist movement, affected the globalization goals of the US in that region, and the US, also wanted to send a message to the Soviet Union. From what little I have read on the topic, the Buddhist struggle for freedom inspired other such movements as well. The most famous one is the Tiananmen Square protests which took place in China in 1989. I think the Buddhist struggle for religious liberty and political justice was more legitimate, when compared to Ngo Dinh Diem’s aspirations to become a theocratic dictator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you guys for taking the time and reading my blog as well as commenting on it! Shaun I thought the connection between Diem and Kennedy both being Catholics was a very interesting aspect of the issue as well and i thought it showed great leadership by Kennedy to not side with Diem because of the shared religion. M Pasbrig when it came to my research regarding the monk setting himself on fire there were views from many sides telling why they believed he set himself on fire but in my opinion I think he did it to show that he and the rest of the Buddhists were going to stand up for their religion but also I believe he saw this as an opportunity to get the message out to the world, showing what was happening in South Vietnam to the people of the Buddhists faith. Trent in my research I found that after Ngo Dinh Diem was ousted as President there was a period of political unrest in the country and there were many leaders put in place, what i found was religion was many times overlooked and no one religion became dominant but I still would like to do more research into South Vietnam to see where they have gotten to today in regards to a national or popular religion. Bidhata I agree with you, this topic is very controversial in American history and i believe the United States solely didn't go to Vietnam to stop religious oppression but i do believe they saw an opportunity to bring some sort of relief to the region from its religious struggles in the past. This topic came off as a very interesting one to me and one that isn't discussed in many history classes making it a fun topic to do research on and that is one of the main reasons i decided to do my blog on it. Thank you again for your comments.

    ReplyDelete