The Islamic
religion is an extremely misunderstood religion in the Western part of the
hemisphere. Here in the United States the only information we know about Islam
is generally seen on the news and it is about the unrest and war occurring in
the Arab world that is dominantly Islamic. What we don’t understand is the
reason why Islam is so different than our own ideologies here in the United
States and what the cause of the turmoil in that region is. Does Islam need to
experience a reformation similar to the Protestant Reformation in the 16th
and 17th centuries? This paper will attempt to answer that question,
and delve into whether or not a reformation is possible or already happening. I
will also be using the example of Turkey, which has shown to be a more moderate
Islamic democracy.
While
there are people who are calling for Islamic Reformation, others believe that
it has already begun. The infighting amongst the two biggest sects of Islam,
the Shiites who represent 15%
of the Muslim world and the Sunnis who represent 85%
is eerily similar to the violence experienced during the Protestant Reformation
in the 16th and 17th centuries. The difficult reality to
consider is whether or not the fighting will end and the tolerance of each sect
will be a result of all of the violence occurring now. If we take a step back
from the region of the Middle East and move South to Sub-Saharan Africa, we
will also see a reformation of Islam that has already taken place. In Senegal,
a reformationist Islamic leader, Cheikh
Toure stresses the relationship between God and the individual as opposed to
traditional Islamic communal practices. Evidence of this reform of Islam in
Sub-Saharan Africa can be seen through the religious practices that have
evolved in Northern Nigeria towards a more modern and individualistic practice.
One example is how they changed their view on how they treat women, and even
opened mosques for women to use, which was a huge innovation for the religion
at the time. It may be hard to compare the regions of Sub-Saharan Africa and
the Middle East because of the larger presence of Islam in the Middle East, the
studies conducted by Loimeier
in Africa offer hope that reformation is possible.
The
question of whether or not Islam is already going through a reformation is up
for debate. While some believe that it is already happening, there are those
who believe that Islam is going in the opposite direction. “Large segments of
the Muslim world are experiencing
a radical return
to ancient doctrine, not a reformation”
This can be seen in societies like ISIS and Syria where stricter forms of
Sharia Law are being enforced rather than eradicated. While this harsher form
of Sharia Law is being imposed on people, modern theology is being blocked at
the same time to prevent any idea of reform ever happening. Thus presenting the
question of whether or not Muslims want a reformation to take place.
Although
the idea of Islamic Reformation happening might offer peace in the war torn
region of the Middle East, there are scholars and other Muslims that believe
that Islam will never go through a reformation and it doesn’t necessarily need
to. Dr. David
Kelley of Princeton offers a different insight to what Islam needs to go
through, but is not a reformation. Kelley compares the Protestant Reformation
in a different way that we have seen before. He believes that the fundamentalist
Islamists of today are similar to the Protestants of the 16th century
reformation. He makes this comparison with the understanding of fundamentalist
Muslims wanting more rigid interpretations of the Quran, just like the
Protestants wanted more literal interpretations of the Bible. Therefore, Kelley
comes to the conclusion that Islam needs not a reformation, but an Enlightenment. Those
that believe that no reformation is needed believe that we need to look at the
Protestant Reformation as a lesson learned, not as an example to follow. “The history
of how secularism developed in Protestant and Catholic countries serves as a
reminder that politics and circumstance shape religion, and its application to
society, far more than abstract theology does. And these forces can change a
faith dramatically even while scripture remains the same.” Here Danforth
is suggesting that the religion of Islam does not need to change, it’s the
politics involved that needs to change. This leads him to conclude that the
best way to approach what is going on in the Middle East is to let them figure
it out amongst themselves without any outside intervention. I spoke to a close
friend, Yasmeen, who is Muslim and practices the religion daily and I presented
her with the same question of whether or not Islam needs a reformation. I
thought it would be interesting to get a personal perspective about the
question at hand, and her opinion proved to be very intriguing. She believes
that Islam will never undergo a reformation to the same scale as the Protestant
Reformation from the 16th and 17th centuries. It is her
belief that the interpretation of Islam and the Quran is the same all around the
world. Her example was that if you were to ask someone a question about the
Quran in the United States, and then you went to Iraq and asked him or her that
same question you would get the same answer. So after some debate about why she
thinks a reformation is not possible, I asked her what she thinks the solution
to all of the conflict in the Middle East would be if it weren’t a reformation.
She firmly believes that it is not the religion that is the problem; it is the
people that are in control. The political leaders in the Middle East are taking
too radical of a stance in regards to the Quran and Sharia Law. So in able to
fix the problems in the region, we have to tackle the issue of the leaders, not
the religion.
With
that said, there is a real life example that can be used as an example where a
small change in Islamic thinking had positive impacts on the country of Turkey.
Whether or not it is successful we will have to see in the future, but the
nation has undergone a change in their Islamic based government in an attempt
to become closer to Europe. Bonner
looks toward an Islamic thinker from the early 1900s, Said Nursi, as the first
to propose this new Turkey. Nursi was the first Islamist in Turkey to be a
“reformist” of Islam by leading a “moral
jihad” to purify the religion of Islam. This idea of inputting more morals
into how people practice Islam was the forefront of how Turkey was able to be
successful in their shift towards a more democratic regime. Then in the 1960s,
based on Nursi’s teachings in the early 20th century, another social
movement led by a man named Gulen began. The hopes of Gulen’s movement was to
create an Islam of, “science, peace and nonviolence.” Between these two
movements over the span of 100 years, these two revolutionary Islamic thinkers
opened over 300 school in the nation of Turkey. With this new modern thinking
among the citizens the incredible hate that Muslims had for the West in Turkey,
the people soon yearned for a bid to join the European Union. In 2001,
a new political party called the Justice and Development Party took the lead in
creating a more pro-democratic Turkey. Another Islamist thinker that had close
ties to the Justice and Development Party is Ali
Bulac. Bulac flip-flopped a little bit on his views about Turkey joining
the European Union. First, he felt that the Islamic Turkey would not be able to
cooperate with the Christian EU. However, after some close studying of the
economic benefits that Turkey might reap from a partial membership in the EU he
changed his view slightly saying the EU wouldn’t allow full membership anyway,
so let’s take what we can and benefit from the deal. These kinds of thinkers
from Turkey paved the way for the economic development that Turkey has
experienced since the 2000s. Since then less than 8% of the people of Turkey
think that Sharia law should rule their country. Takim,
a religious scholar in Canada, studied how Sharia law has shifted from being
the Law of Islam, to becoming the law against the infidels, or those who do not
practice Islam. Therefore, it is promising that a small number of Turkish
citizens believe that Sharia Law should not be applied in their country.
Turkey
provides the world with good example of how it is possible for an Islamic based
country to work with democratic regimes economically. While Turkey wasn’t 100%
democratic, they instilled some factors of democracy into their regime, which
enabled them to build their economy, which in turn helped the citizens of the
country as well. I believe that if some countries in the Middle East were able
to create some sort of stability in their countries, a similar regime in their
countries would be possible. While a change in such an old religion is hard and
nearly impossible, I truly believe that the people of Islam in the Middle East
could live in peace. If they undergo some of the similar belief modifications
that Turkey went through in their country, it would be better for the economies
of those countries, and in turn it would benefit the citizens who live there.
With the evidence presented it is possible that a reformation is happening
within the Islamic religion. The Protestant Reformation looked eerily similar
to what is happening in the Middle East: the persecution, fighting and changes.
All of that is happening in the region and hopefully, if history really repeats
itself, we will see peace unfold in the region in the future.
Your analysis of this topic was thorough and clear. Turkey was a great example to use. It was also nice that you recognized that Sharia law is no longer the proper Islamic law due to human corruption. Great paper!
ReplyDeleteThis is an important subject for the people of the United States to understand as Islam continues to be the number one growing religion in the world. I think another argument to be made on the politics of the Middle East is geography. This part of the world has always been harsh and has created a tough people to cope with the harsh environment. For hundreds of years before and after the creation of Islam, the laws of Hammurabi have been a major influence on code of law of the Middle East and it’s not surprising why. Hammurabi taught to meet the crime with the same crime (an eye for an eye) and this made sense in a region where resources are scarce and to make an example of lawbreakers is necessary for survival. I also agree that an Enlightenment, not a reform, is needed for the region. The Protestant Reformation by itself did not stop the Christian problems in Europe, it made them worse. But with the Enlightenment, God’s creations were given understanding and science was no longer vilified but romanticized into God’s will. If that’s what it takes for Middle Eastern countries to become less hard lined and more peaceful, I’m all for it.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your using of Turkey for an example. Indeed, it should serve as a great beacon to other nations of Islam that are caught in turmoil. I wonder what it will take to get the individual leaders of these countries out of power. When that happens, how swift will the shift to a more secular nation be? If Turkey's revolution took decades, will it take decades for the other nations of Islam to make the same kind of reformation or "Enlightenment?" It's interesting to think about those who interpret the Quran literally and very conservative protestants as similar people. They really are though! Both grasp firmly to their ideals and believe that God's word is not something that can be changed through time. I think it is quite impossible to change the mind of someone that feels this strongly, but you might be able to change the minds of the people slowly through generations.
ReplyDeleteI think the topic you chose to research is discussed a lot regarding Islam among both non-Muslims and Muslims. However, I do not think there is a significant movement towards reformation of Islam, but perhaps reformation of Muslims. The Quran may have been changed, or the history believed about Islamic civilization may be a lie, but the Quran attributes none of its words to those other than Allah. The Bible, for example, has words it attributes to those other than God, such as Paul, but this is not the case in Islam. There are also many thousands of Muslims who memorized the Quran word-for-word in Arabic, called Hafiz, who recite it among themselves and other Muslims. I think there is a movement among Muslims though, which in some instances has caused people harm, which seeks to interpret Islam relative to modern times, as it is in new societies, rather than trying to interpret what a Muslim or some Muslims supposedly said years before.
ReplyDelete